Trending Now

Braid: Hinshaw’s out, Smith names mainstream AHS doctor as CMOH

Dr. Mark Joffe is an admired figure at AHS. Albertans can also rest assured that he is not denying medical science

Article content

Dr. Deena Hinshaw was replaced as chief medical officer of health late Monday afternoon. The new CMOH is dr. Mark Joffe, a top AHS executive who played a key role in the province’s pandemic response.

Advertisement 2

Article content

Joffe is an admired figure at AHS. Albertans can also rest assured that he is not denying medical science.

Article content

In October 2021, Joffe wrote an opinion piece for the Herald saying ivermectin was not an effective treatment for COVID. Accusations that AHS was withholding this from the public were unfair, he argued.

“There are genuine concerns about fraudulent data being reported from some of the early trials, and the largest trial supporting ivermectin use has already been withdrawn due to data fraud,” Joffe wrote with two other experts.

P
remier Danielle Smith, of course, openly advocated ivermectin and said AHS was suppressing information about alternative treatments.

The dissonance here is striking. There was understandable fear that Smith would name a quack in the key CMOH post. Joffe is anything but. His appointment suggests that Smith wants to leave certain tracks from her radio career far behind.

Advertisement 3

Article content

In fact, this is the first obvious sign of a pre-election pivot to the mainstream. She also disagreed with questions yesterday about her link to controversial figure Paul Alexander, saying she did not invite him to Alberta.

What’s next for Dr. Hinshaw is not known. Details of her departure were still being worked out on Monday afternoon.

Alberta's Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr.  Deena Hinshaw, gives a COVID-19 pandemic update from the media room at the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton on July 28, 2021.
Alberta’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, Dr. Deena Hinshaw, gives a COVID-19 pandemic update from the media room at the Alberta Legislature in Edmonton on July 28, 2021. Photo by Ian Kucerak /Postmedia, file

The first question facing the new CMOH is – who decides? Do you issue public health orders, or will the province finally admit the obvious – politicians do?

Smith also referred several times to more big changes in health care later in the week. This means that a sole commissioner of health care will be appointed.

The currently appointed board may not actually be fired, only suspended, but the new commissioner will nevertheless have all the legal authority of the full board. The point of it is to move quickly with Smith’s health reforms in AHS.

Advertisement 4

Article content

Smith has repeatedly promised health executives compensation for the move, which was last used in 2014 on a much smaller issue.

“It’s going to be a little bumpy for the next 90 days,” Smith said in a recent speech to the Edmonton Chamber of Commerce.

“I know it’s dangerous to try to reform an area this big so close to an election, but we have to do it.”

At some point, AHS (which means the commissioner) will also have to name a new chief executive officer to finally replace dr. To replace Verna Yiu, who was fired on April 4.

Advertisement 5

Article content

Dr. Mauro Chies has been transferred to that role on an interim basis. He is another veteran from the top tier of AHS.

Can Smith keep him as full-time AHS boss, too? That seems unlikely, given her frequent talk of cutting the executive ranks. But the Joffe decision may indicate that she feels the best people to reform the system are already there.

AHS will take orders from her appointed commissioner, no doubt from her, and the commissioner will be accountable to the government.

All of this points to major changes elsewhere in the AHS management layer. It will soon be smaller, even though the UCP’s own study in 2019 showed that the management contingent at AHS is not inflated, although it could be more efficient.

Smith is acting quickly on these changes (she has only been prime minister since October 11) to get the public uproar out of the way quickly.

After that, the goal is to get public attention for changes on the ground, especially in EMS and emergency rooms.

Overall, these moves are an obvious political takeover of the quasi-independent healthcare system. This has also been done before. Over time, it didn’t work.

The question for the public is – will health care reform finally work?

Don Braid’s column appears regularly in the Herald

Twitter: @DonBraid

Advertisement 1

Commentary

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourages all readers to share their opinions on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask that you keep your comments relevant and respectful. We’ve enabled email notifications—you’ll now receive an email when you receive a reply to your comment, there’s an update to a comment thread you follow, or when a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *